Autumn 2006

Newsletter Home | Contact | GRC

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

Autumn 2006 Newsletter: Partner Interview with

John Tauxe of Neptune and Company

 

John Tauxe, a Senior Environmental Engineer at Neptune and Company, is one of the most experienced GoldSim modelers around. Neptune is an environmental consulting company that specializes in environmental statistics and decision analysis, probabilistic modelling, environmental fate and transport modelling, and human health and ecological risk assessment. Neptune engineers and scientists have been applying GoldSim to help solve complex environmental problems for over six years.

John is particularly well known within the GoldSim user community for producing very well-documented and easy to understand models, and he regularly demonstrates these models and shares his expertise at our user conferences. John has an M.S. and Ph.D in Civil Engineering from the University of Texas, and a B.S. in Earth Sciences from Wesleyan University. John took some time to chat with us about GoldSim, modeling and consulting.

What is a common mistake that you see new modelers make?

A problem typical of novices, and not just in GoldSim, is neglecting to document their work. Come to think of it, this is not just a problem for novices, either. When it comes to slapping elements together to build a model, there is an appropriate time for experimentation without the encumbrance of writing it all up, but the organization and writing, while seemingly tedious, pays off in the long run. Not only can other modelers understand what has been done, and often improve on it (which is a good thing), you yourself can understand it in a years' time.

What has been one of your firm's most technically challenging projects?

A current project that has been technically challenging is the design of a model of a radioactive waste disposal site at the Nevada Test Site. After years in the making, the current model is quite mature, and has some rather sophisticated GoldSim tricks in it. The biggest challenge has been to design a single model that will address several disparate regulatory compliance issues at once. Our biggest upcoming challenge is to add in cost/benefit analyses to optimize waste disposal operations.

How does your firm leverage word-of-mouth or satisfied customers for additional business?

Working in a niche field like environmental decision making, we rely heavily on word-of-mouth to get our name out there. In the Federal arena, this works fairly well, and we find ourselves working for various agencies and persons who know each other and talk about us. In consulting for private clients, word-of-mouth is not so effective, since private firms seem not to talk to each other so much.

How does your firm deal with the boom/bust nature of consulting work?

We just ride the waves, and it is sometimes harrowing. Especially with Government work, we find ourselves in a bind to get all the work done by the end of the Fiscal Year, followed by sometimes months of waiting for the funding to fall into place. October is a good time for vacations!

What was one was one of your initial challenges when you first started creating models with GoldSim, and how did you overcome?

Many models have similar containers, constructed in parallel, and with elements inside that share the same names. This became terribly confusing: "WHICH element called Soil Concentration are we talking about, here?" This gets all cleared up by extensive use of output aliases for localized Containers, which are underrated. With aliases, the ambiguity about which element is being referred to is gone.

What is a debugging technique you use when building new models?

I rely heavily on the linking that is provided by the "element affects..." and "element function of.." functions. I also will temporarily turn on all the time histories in a given container, just to help track influences down. And, when it comes down to it, there are times when a good old manual calculation on a calculator can provide comforting verification.

Is there a particular common misunderstanding when talking to prospects that you often find yourself correcting, such as unrealistic expectations of some sort?

I am not a miracle worker. I can't make your site pass the regs if you've dumped too much material in there. Well, I could (and you could easily find someone who will), but not while sticking to my code of ethics. :)

If you were talking at a high school career day, what branch of engineering would you recommend aspiring students pursue?

I would have the same recommendation to those who would pursue engineering or other fields: Follow your muse. If engineering appeals to you, which is to say if you like problem solving, understanding how things work, and playing with Legos, then there is probably some branch of engineering that would appeal to you. Think broadly -- the field ranges from environmental protection to the design of medical prostheses to roller coasters to spacecraft to deep ocean instrumentation to habitats in Antarctica. Dream it, and make it happen!

Heard any good jokes lately?

OK. One of my favorites:

Wife: "Honey, I've got great news: I won the lottery! Go pack your bags."

Husband: "Oh, great! Where should I pack for? The islands? The mountains? Where are we going?"

Wife: "I don't care where you go. Just pack your bags and get out of here!"