Fall 2005

Newsletter Home | Contact | GRC

 

 

FEATURED GOLDSIM APPLICATION

Use of GoldSim in Animal Nutrition Research

Dr David Pacheco
Metabolism & Microbial Genomics
AgResearch Ltd. Grasslands Research Centre. Private Bag 11008
Palmerston North, New Zealand,
david.pacheco@agresearch.co.nz

Background

New Zealand dairy products account for 19% of the value of the country's exports. This high-value industry relies heavily on the ability of dairy cows to utilise forages as their main dietary staple. This is a big contrast to dairy operations in North America, where cows are fed grains and conserved forages of known chemical composition. In grazing systems, the quality of the pasture is an ever-changing playing field: weather, forage variety, level of fertilisation, and age of the plant are some of many factors influencing the quality of the cows' diet. The chemical composition of the forage, and hence its nutritive value, change from season to season, from paddock to paddock, from day to day and even within the same day!

Because experimentation in animal nutrition can be expensive and time consuming, a way to maximise chances of success in our research projects is through simulation of nutritional scenarios. In this example, GoldSim has been used to simulate changes in the pasture chemical composition and their effects on the digestion by cows. In particular, this simulation aims to replicate what happens in the forestomach of a lactating cow, and how the fermentation of the forage affects the amount of protein available to the cow for productive purposes.

Cows are "ruminants". In common terms, ruminants are animals that "chew the cud". They differ from other animals because part of the digestion process in done by microbia living in association within the cows. Thanks to the microbia, ruminants can digest fibrous vegetal material (like grasses) to obtain energy and protein.

In a simplified way, the bugs in the forestomach of the cow can provide protein to their host as long as there is a source of energy and nitrogen available. The more the energy available, the better the bugs grow and the more the protein the cow gets for her own use. If there is too much nitrogen relative to the energy, then the bugs cannot make protein and the excess of nitrogen is wasted as ammonia. Once absorbed into the bloodstream ammonia can be toxic for animals. The cow liver is good at inactivating this toxin by transforming it into urea, which travels in the blood and is excreted by the kidney (in urine) and the udder (in milk). Hence, milk can be used as an indicator of how much nitrogen is being wasted in the rumen… which is good, because direct measurements of the microbial activity are technically difficult (particularly when cows are grazing on a paddock!).

Simulation of Nitrogen Digestion in the Cow Using GoldSim

A static model of cow digestion (National Research Council Dairy Nutrient Requirements, 2002) was coded into an Excel spreadsheet. To test the model, experimental data on forage analysis and feed intake over a period of 9 weeks was used.

A GoldSim model was built with three containers:

  • "DietInfo"' container was used to store all the information on the diet;

  • "NRCcontainer" consisted of a Spreadsheet Element linking the inputs from "DietInfo" to the Excel spreadsheet with all the calculations for the static model of digestion; and

  • "Results"' container was used to keep all the graphical output of interest.

Figure 1. Top level of the simulation model.

The known chemical composition of pasture and feed intake (2 weekly measurements) were entered in Information Time Series elements. Using these elements it was possible to make the static model behave like a dynamic simulation over time. The data set used contained information representing the average pasture quality of a given paddock… but there is variation among areas in the paddock, and also between what the researcher sampled and what the animals actually ate. To simulate this variation, the Information Time Series data were used as the mean of distributions defined by Stochastic elements.

Generally speaking, high values of fibre correspond to low values of protein (CP) and sugars (SSS) in forages. This was simulated by using correlations between the stochastic elements and fibre (ADF) to mimic the interrelationships observed in the real pasture. For all stochastic elements, a normal distribution of values with means given by the observed chemical composition was assumed.

The spreadsheet element received the information generated by the Stochastic elements and changed the values of diet composition and intake every day over the length (63 d) of the simulation.

The simulation was set up to run for 50 realizations, which included 63 days, with triggering of the Stochastic elements every day.

The spreadsheet model estimated the amount of nitrogen the microbia could utilise to synthesise protein according to the chemical composition of the pasture. Any difference between the supply of nitrogen and the microbial capacity defined by the energy of the diet was calculated to be the "nitrogen balance" in the forestomach of the cow. Positive balance (i.e. more supply than what the bugs needed) was assumed to be nitrogen excess.

Figure 2. Simulated nitrogen balance in the forestomach of the cow.

The simulated digestion results were compared to the experimental data on milk urea. If the model was predicting in a sensible way, it could be expected to find positive association between the nitrogen given in excess and the concentration of milk urea. In general, the upward trend on the simulated nitrogen balance in the forestomach of the cow follows the trend on the observed milk urea values for the herd (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Plot of observed milk urea (red) and simulated nitrogen balance (black) from digestion of forage.

The simulated values appear to be a sensible representation of what happened as part of the digestion of the forage. This initial assessment will be confirmed with further experimental data and then the model will be updated as required. Further work is intended to test the model using more frequent forage sampling. More intensive research could also be used to generate better estimates of forage intake to run this model.